To avoid confusion do not call them circles, but local associations, which provide a form of statuary as homogeneous as possible, starting from the regional level and then get off at different levels (national, province), where there was the potential organization.
It 'important to maintain a degree of uniformity and from Rome, ensures support in place quickly in network addresses, websites, blogs, groups and events on face-book which refer to LiberalPD.
I think it is absolutely ideal to separate the two levels, namely the direct participation of the party (membership) than the association membership, partly because in today's debate, the brilliant intervention of the Mayor of Forlì candidate has explained how it is easier promote our ideas in the PD from the outside rather than inside. The secular parties and opinion from
which we come to a distinguished political figures and an electorate in general paid little attention towards local issues closely.
Therefore the system of local clubs (often at the scale of the neighborhoods of a city), which has organized the PD, is not well suited to appeal to our supporters.
The people close to our area do not conceive politics as a limited commitment to the local context, especially if smaller, have a different attitude, are taken to address broader issues on the merits of the things they choose, rather than on ideologies, have a strong individualistic attitude, and then for all these reasons are not easy to build loyalty to a ' organization of community-based as it is today that of PD.
often also express a mobility and a 'professional opening, which sees them players on several fronts in different places, so it's entirely appropriate to the model suggested by friends of Umbria, which I think is one of the few ways by which we groped a membership in the party, with some useful results.
It is also important not to establish any automatic link between membership of the Party and the LiberalPD because most of our friends and potential supporters are located in the central area of \u200b\u200bthe border between the center and the center, which has steadily decided where to place them in PD and still does not recognize a real party reformer.
This needs to be kept as autonomous as possible and strengthen, gaining what little credibility, consistency and visibility, without which the PD there ever take seriously.
If we examine our presence in parliament and governing bodies of PD, local and national, we can not say that there have been wide open the doors on the other hand if they would see why not, since in politics there is the generosity .
LiberalPD must qualify for its ability to generate ideas, challenges, contamination inside and out, establishing contacts collaborations and relations with the reformist personalities, now a bit 'isolated within the party, and with the centers, cultural institutions of liberal and liberal-area, going up to the Radical Party, which often share many positions.
Only the power of ideas, the courage of the most uncomfortable and visionary can effectively support our organizational weaknesses, knowing from the outset that the idea of \u200b\u200bthe Democratic Party, that we all had in mind, it remains a difficult task in the name of which we can accept defeats with a view to future success, but not compromise on principles.
0 comments:
Post a Comment